|

Megan is a graduate of
Bachelor of Agricultural Science with first degree honours from the
University of Adelaide. She commenced her PhD studies in 1998,
having been awarded a University of Adelaide scholarship with a 'top
up' from the Wool CRC. Megan's project is investigating the
partitioning of nutrients between meat and wool. Her supervisors are
Prof Phil Hynd (UA) and Dr Dean Revell (UA).


Top: Veronica
Ingham, Megan Bray, and Natasha Penno. Bottom: Megan
Bray. |
|

Partitioning of
nutrients between meat and wool
"In all animals there is
continuing competition for the use of amino acids for the
maintenance of body functions and for the production of important
products, such as wool and meat in sheep. The way in which animals
control amino acid partitioning between different tissues is not
only an interesting biological question, but it also has important
implications to the economic viability of animal production
enterprises. Primary producers are striving to improve production
efficiency and economic viability and, in the case of sheep
production, this is heavily dependent on the relative value of wool
and meat. The price differential between these two products is not
constant, and hence some flexibility to switch the emphasis between
primarily wool or muscle (meat) is desirable.
To investigate nutrient
partitioning between muscle and skin, I selected sheep with distinct
phenotypes based on clean fleece weight (CFW) and body weight (BW)
parameters, that is, High CFW, High BW; Low CFW, High BW; Low CFW,
Low BW; High CFW, Low BW. These unique phenotypes were selected from
the Selection Demonstration Flock, based at Turretfield Research
Centre, and enabled investigation into the regulation of
partitioning between both CFW and BW.

Figure 1 demonstrates the large
variation in BW and CFW across a typical flock and raises the
questions:
-
Why do animals
under the same environmental conditions, of the same age and body
weight, differ in CFW by 4-5 kilograms?
-
Why do animals
under the same environmental conditions, of the same age and CFW,
differ by 35-40 kilograms in body weight?
The complexity of nutrient
utilisation creates difficulties when studying the determinants of,
and factors controlling, meat and wool production. It is proposed
that these four phenotypes differ in the way in which they partition
nutrients between the muscle and the skin, as a result of
differences in:
-
the relative
rates of protein synthesis and degradation, in skin and muscle,
-
the growth
hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) axis.
The initial six to eight months
of my scholarship involved the characterisation and selection of 60
sheep to form four distinct experimental phenotypes, with my first
experiment conducted over the following five and a half month
period. This involved daily feeding of the animals and diet
determination, blood sampling for hormone profiling, wool growth
rate measurement, faeces, urine and feed collection for nitrogen
analysis, and animal slaughter and tissue collection for molecular
analysis (ie. GH and IGF-1 mRNA and corresponding receptor mRNA
quantification). The GH/IGF-1 axis was chosen due to its well
documented anabolic effects and possible role in wool growth.
Experiment 2 will require the
same selection process as explained previously. We are proposing
that animals which differ in wool and meat production differ in
protein synthesis and/or degradation in these tissues. Muscle and
skin are both predominantly composed of protein, which is
continuously synthesised and broken down at different rates. The
balance between synthesis and breakdown determines the net amount of
protein deposited in the end products and is quantified by tracer
infusion using the arterio-venous technique, and muscle and skin
biopsying. The selection of sheep for this experiment will be
finalised in November, with the experiment itself taking place early
next year.
Developing an understanding of
the partitioning of nutrients to particular productive functions,
namely wool and meat production, has very important implications to
the efficiency of animal production, which ultimately affects the
financial viability of sheep producing enterprises."
|