|
Quotes from cooperating mills
Lanificio Fratelli Cerruti 1881: "Our
company was well impressed by the
results and performance from the long
Hauteur wool in spinning.We are
wishing for similar performance in the
remaining important stages of the
fabric-making process which will provide
final proof that longer Hauteur wools
can reach our quality level."
Fabrica de Casmires Rivetex:
"We
obtained better spinning results with only
one lot and very similar values in the
other.We want to conduct several more
trials in order to measure and analyse
wastage in each step,higher spinning
speeds,efficiency in spinning and
weaving and if less twist can be used."
Toabo:
"We were delighted to collaborate
with other international mills and learnt
a lot from the trial.The results were
better than expected,and spinning ends
down were very good.We are seeking to
know more about the limits possible
using longer fibres."
Kurabo:
"We had very good results in
yarn properties and spinning
performance,but can ’t yet say for fabric
and garment properties.We see this trial
as big advantage for wool research."
Woolworths:
"Long Hauteur wool
produces good quality yarn and
improved handle of the fabric."
|
|
An update on the long Hauteur project
In the May 1999 issue of The Wool Press we reported preliminary results from a
project aimed at determining whether or not the belief that longer-stapled wools
perform poorly in early and late-stage processing is sound. The results of these
trials indicated clearly that longer wools produced less romaine after carding and
combing. We can now report that such wools also performed better in spinning
and weaving.
In October 1999, representatives of the mills met with researchers in Perth.
The spinners agreed that in all trials the long Hauteur wool performed at least as
well as conventional length top, and in some cases proved to be a much more
efficient performer. The number of ‘ends down’, that is yarn breaks in spinning,
was reduced substantially in most mills using longer wools of 18.5 and 20.5
micron diameter. It was found necessary to adjust machinery settings for longer
wools but no changes to spinning frames were made.
A total of eight pairs of fabrics from three of the mills have now been
objectively and subjectively compared. The paired comparison was with a wool of
normal length but the same diameter, except in one case, where the wool was
1mm finer. The judging panels and measurements were in good agreement and
showed that, although the fabrics were nearly identical, those from longer fibres
were slightly preferred in terms of ‘silky softness’ but not as much as 1mm
finer fibres.
The final report is still in preparation, however, the key result is that the results
were broadly consistent with the stated advantages of longer wools. The mill that
did not observe a clear advantage is undertaking further trials. An additional
result was that one mill spun two fine count knitting yarns and observed very
much improved performance in terms of reduced breaks in knitting. A list of
potential suppliers of long Hauteur tops has been given to mills, most of whom
appear to have sought further supplies, but seem to have had difficulty in coming
to suitable arrangements.
As expected, the mills did not encounter detrimental effects from the high or
low CV(H) values of the two wools. However, the strong industry beliefs in the
importance of CV(H) are still penalising long wools by not allowing them to be of
lower staple strength or to be blended with shorter wools. A follow-up project to
address CV(H) issues has been prepared.
|